The Home of U.S. History Resources for Students, Teachers, and Everyone Else
  • Home
  • INFO.
    • Blog
    • Contact & Tutoring
    • AP Grader/Table Leader Memories
    • Hall of Honor
    • Support
  • resources
    • Curriculum, AP & CP >
      • Semester One (To 1877)
      • Semester Two A (c. 1869-c. 1945)
      • Semester Two B (1945-Today)
    • APUSH Specific >
      • AP Syllabus Samples
      • AP GENERAL INFO.
      • AP Classroom
      • WHICH AP TEXTBOOK SHOULD YOU USE?
      • American Pageant Curriculum Alignment & Pacing Guide
      • The Court Cases
      • Analyzing Political Cartoons
      • The Writing: SAQ, LEQ, DBQ
      • STUDENT REVIEW
    • Teacher Specific >
      • using AI >
        • Which Engine to Use
        • Using AI with Student Scripts
      • Teacher Links
      • Class Starters
      • Analyzing Political Cartoons
    • Textbook Chapters, AP and CP
    • Simulations
    • The Gymnasticon
    • DEBATES (Forensics)
  • Enrichment
    • Quiet Space
    • american art forms >
      • Peacefield Library
      • Rick's Café Américain
      • Gilbert Stuart's Museum of American Art
      • The Glass Armonica
    • The Nutmeg Tavern
    • American Money/Coinage
    • American Movement
    • The History Guy
    • MAKE THEM TELL YOU "NO"
    • The Mouse
    • The Green Dragon
  • Home
  • INFO.
    • Blog
    • Contact & Tutoring
    • AP Grader/Table Leader Memories
    • Hall of Honor
    • Support
  • resources
    • Curriculum, AP & CP >
      • Semester One (To 1877)
      • Semester Two A (c. 1869-c. 1945)
      • Semester Two B (1945-Today)
    • APUSH Specific >
      • AP Syllabus Samples
      • AP GENERAL INFO.
      • AP Classroom
      • WHICH AP TEXTBOOK SHOULD YOU USE?
      • American Pageant Curriculum Alignment & Pacing Guide
      • The Court Cases
      • Analyzing Political Cartoons
      • The Writing: SAQ, LEQ, DBQ
      • STUDENT REVIEW
    • Teacher Specific >
      • using AI >
        • Which Engine to Use
        • Using AI with Student Scripts
      • Teacher Links
      • Class Starters
      • Analyzing Political Cartoons
    • Textbook Chapters, AP and CP
    • Simulations
    • The Gymnasticon
    • DEBATES (Forensics)
  • Enrichment
    • Quiet Space
    • american art forms >
      • Peacefield Library
      • Rick's Café Américain
      • Gilbert Stuart's Museum of American Art
      • The Glass Armonica
    • The Nutmeg Tavern
    • American Money/Coinage
    • American Movement
    • The History Guy
    • MAKE THEM TELL YOU "NO"
    • The Mouse
    • The Green Dragon

The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. ​

America's Highest Court

Which Supreme Court cases should you know? Find out below.
For the US History student, the many cases that have made it to the Supreme Court are at best remote and technical, presenting severe comprehension issues. Here is a breakdown to help focus on the cases most likely to be on any assessment.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Broken into respective periods, you should know a landmark case or two from each Era.
​
SEMESTER ONE ERAS
​The Early Republic (1789-1801)
The Formative Years (1801–1835)
The Antebellum-Civil War Period (1836–1864)
The Reconstruction Era (1864-1873)
SEMESTER TWO ERAS
The Laissez-faire Era (1874-1930)
The Shift Toward Activism (1930–1953)
The Commitment to Activism (1953–1969)
The Mixed Reaction to Activism (1969–1986)
​​The Conservative Era (1986–2005)

SEMESTER ONE


Court Eras

Picture
​The Early Republic
The Jay, Rutledge, and Ellsworth Supreme Courts (1789-1801)

There are no Court decisions from this period that likely will be used to assess any knowledge of US History.
​AP Period 3


​

Landmark Court Case Decisions

Picture
Key Cases:

If you are an Alpha student, check out Chisolm v. Georgia (Also see the 11th Amendment).



​

​

Picture
The Formative Years
The Marshall Court (1801–1835)

The Marshall Court strengthened federal authority, established judicial review, protected business and contracts, and promoted a unified national economy over state power.
​AP Period 4

​
Must-Know Terms from This Era:

​"Judicial Review"-
The power of the Supreme Court to determine if the actions of the legislative or executive branches of the government are constitutional. Before Justice Marshall's Marbury decision, this was a theoretical power (versus a traditional court power to determine a winning side or guilt or innocence) not specifically mentioned in the Constitution. By using this power, Marshall made the Judiciary a much more important and powerful branch of our government.

"Loose Construction"-Interpreting the Constitution to allow implied powers not specifically stated, increasing the powers of the Federal government--the opposite of the state's rights interpretation of "Strict Construction," seeking to limit the power of government.
​

Picture
The Antebellum-Civil War Period
The Taney Court (1836–1864)

The Taney Court strengthened states’ rights, allowed greater state regulation of business, and protected slavery—culminating in the Dred Scott decision that intensified sectional conflict before the Civil War. Unlike Marshall, Taney often ruled in favor of state authority, especially in economic matters.
AP Periods 4 & 5

​
Must-Know Terms from This Era:

​"Strict Construction" & States' Rights-
Interpreting the Constitution as to limit the Federal government to only the powers strictly enumerated in the Constitution, with any new powers going to the States and the people (10th Amendment), This preserves the State's power against the Federal government, protecting them from any infringement on their sovereignty.

​
Picture
Key Cases:
  • Marbury v. Madison (1801)
    • Established judicial review.
    • Made the Supreme Court the final interpreter of the Constitution.
Impact:
✔ Strengthened the judicial branch, permanently, ensuring checks and balances
  • McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
    • ​​Ruled states could not tax the national bank.
      • Confirmed Congress’s implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause
Impact:
✔ Expanded federal authority and supported the loose interpretation of the Constitution (growing government power)
  • Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
    • Ruled that only the federal government could regulate interstate commerce.
Impact:
✔ Encouraged national expansion, while preventing states from interfering with economic growth
  • Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819)
    • Ruled that corporations’ contracts could not be altered by states.
​Impact:
✔Encouraged investment and business growth



​


Picture
Key Cases:
  • Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
    • Ruled that African Americans were not citizens and could not sue in federal court
    • Declared Congress could not ban slavery in the territories (Missouri Compromise unconstitutional; challenged popular sovereignty)
Impact:
✔ Strengthened slaveholders’ rights
✔ Increased sectional conflict and helped push the nation toward the Civil War


  • Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge (1837)
    • Ruled states could create competing businesses even if it hurt existing companies
Impact:
✔ Encouraged competition
✔ Reduced special privileges for corporations

​






​

​


Picture
The Reconstruction Era
​
The Chase Court (1864-1873)
The Chase Court strengthened the constitutional authority of the federal government after the Civil War while limiting military power and narrowly interpreting Reconstruction amendments, which weakened long-term protections for former slaves.
AP Period 5

Picture
​
  • Ex parte Milligan (1866)
    • Ruled that civilians cannot be tried in military courts when civilian courts are open
    • Limited presidential wartime powers




  • ​


SEMESTER TWO


Picture
The Laissez-faire Era 
The Waite, Fuller, White, and Taft Courts (1874-1930)
These courts were characterized by strong conservatism, support for business, limits on labor protection and government regulation, weakening federal protection of African Americans, and allowing states and corporations greater power. The Courts of this Era eventually made some progress in accepting the reform efforts of Progressives. During World War I, the Court allowed major restrictions on civil liberties.
AP Periods 6 & 7


Must-Know Terms from This Era:

"Laissez-faire"-
An economic and social philosophy advocating minimal government 
intervention, allowing individuals 
and markets to operate free of regulations.


"Separate but Equal" concept-Supporting segregation by interpreting access to public accommodations being equal despite requiring separate locations based on ethnicity. Overturned by the Brown decision, 1954.

The "Lochner Era"-This term is used to describe the laissez-faire approach of the Court to economic and labor decisions, favoring minimal government intervention in business affairs and worker issues.

The "Rule of Reason"-Coming out of the Standard Oil Case, it established that 
only monopolies that "unreasonably" restrained trade were illegal, and that monopolies themselves were not.

The "Brandeis Brief"-Progressive Louis Brandeis successfully argued before the Court that sociological and medical conditions (current women's condition in factory work), rather than past precedent should determine the decision of the Court (activism believing that the societal changes from the past require new interpretations of the law and Constitution).

The "Clear and Present Danger" Test-Free s
peech can be limited if it creates a “clear and present danger” to national security and public welfare.


























Picture
Key Cases:
  • Munn v. Illinois (1877)
    • ​Until the Wabash case severely limited state regulation of business, allowed state regulation of private enterprises   
  • Impact:
  • ✔ Would influence future decisions, after this Era, moving away from Laissez-Faire attitudes toward the acceptance of government regulation of private business
  • ​
  • United States v. E. C. Knight Co. (1895)
    • ​Limited the federal government’s ability to regulate monopolies under the Sherman Antitrust Act
    • Ruled manufacturing was not interstate commerce. 
  • Impact:
  • ✔ Limited the federal government’s ability to regulate monopolies under the Sherman Antitrust Act, strengthening corporations

  • Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
    • ​Ruled racial segregation was constitutional if facilities were “separate but equal.”
  • Impact:
    ✔ Legalized segregation nationwide
    ✔ Jim Crow laws and segregation expanded for decades
    (This decision remained until overturned by 1954's Brown Decision.)

  • Lochner v. New York (1905)
    • Established a series of cases striking down economic regulations, asserting that states could not limit working hours or wages under the Due Process Clause
    • Impact:
    • ✔ Strengthened property rights and business interests over labor protections and civil rights

  • The "Insular Cases" (c. 1901)
    • ​Affirmed that territories are not “part of the United States” for certain constitutional purposes but are still subject to U.S. jurisdiction in other areas
    • Impact:
    • ✔ Economic and Constitution rights do not automatically apply to the new territories acquired by the United States--the Constitution does not follow the flag.​​

  • Muller v. Oregon (1908)
    • Marked a departure from the earlier Lochner v. New York decision, which had struck down similar labor regulations on the grounds of individual freedom of contract. The Court made the first step toward accepting Progressivism and government regulation of business
  • Impact:
  • ✔ The Court made the first major step toward accepting progressivism and government regulation of business and private property.

  • Schenk, Abrams, and Debs Cases (1917-1919)
    • In time of war and national emergency, radical, political free speech can be limited by the government. This is a great opportunity to link the Espionage and Sedition Acts, Patriot Act, etc. to the Alien and Sedition Acts, as well as the limits of civil rights and dissent in time of war!
  • Impact:
  • ✔ Challenged political dissent and free speech


Picture

The Shift Toward Activism
The Hughes, Stone, and Vinson Courts (1930–1953)
After finding parts of President Roosevelt's New Deal unconstitutional, the Court eventually upheld FDR's programs and regulations, ending the "Lockner Era" of resistance to government regulation and extended power over the economy. The Court also expanded the authority of the federal government in time of war, albeit at the cost of civil liberty.  
​AP Periods 7 & 8

Must-Know Terms from This Era:


​The "Switch in Time Saves Nine"-After Roosevelt’s "court-packing" threat to increase the number of judges on the Court to help support the New Deal, the Court shifted to uphold federal regulation (the most conservative judges left).



Picture
The Commitment to Activism
The Warren Court (1953–1969)
​
Characterized by an unprecedented expansion of civil rights and civil liberties, judicial activism, and the use of the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment to promote equality and protect the rights of the accused, ushering in the civil rights movements of the 1950s and 1960s.
AP Period 8

Must-Know Terms from This Era:


"Miranda Rights"- “You have the right to remain silent.   Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you. Do you understand the rights I have just read to you?"

"Malapportionment" & "One Person, One Vote" Goal-The need for voting redistricting in the 1960s was primarily due to the urbanization trends of the late 1800s and early 1900s--the population had shifted to cities, but districts continued to give power to rural areas that had lost population. The result was that a smaller number of people living in a rural district might have the same or more political power as a much larger group in an urban area. Rural areas would have disproportionate influence.

"Integration"-Working to create equal access in public accommodations for all groups in society

​
"Affirmative Action"- Affirmative action refers to the act of trying to create increased opportunities for minority or disadvantaged classes, giving preference to these groups in hiring, selection, promotions, and representation.

Picture

​The Mixed Reaction to Activism
The Burger Court (1969–1986)
​
Characterized by a partial conservative shift after the Warren Court, but with continued expansion of some civil liberties—especially in privacy rights—while limiting certain criminal procedure protections and allowing greater law-and-order policies.

AP Periods 8 & 9

Must-Know Terms from This Era:


"Reverse Discrimination"- Using
affirm action, quotas, etc. to target only specific ethnicities and groups for special consideration in employment, access, etc.

​
​


​





Picture

Key Cases:

  • Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States (1935)
    • Determined that the New Deal wrongly gave legislative authority to the executive branch.
Impact:
✔ Created a battle between President Roosevelt and the Supreme Court over the New Deal and led to the "court-packing" controversy
✔ First challenge to a New Deal program


  • Korematsu v. United States (1944)
    • Upheld Japanese American internment during World War II​
​Impact:
✔ Expanded wartime executive power
✔ One of the most controversial rulings in U.S. history








​

Picture
Key Cases:
  • Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
    • Overturned Plessy v. Ferguson’s “separate but equal” doctrine in public education. ​
​Impact:
✔ Began the modern civil rights movement
✔ Challenged Jim Crow segregation
​
  • Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
    • Required police to inform suspects of their rights ​
​Impact:
✔ With the Mapp and Giddeon cases, expanded protections under the 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendments
✔ Strengthened civil liberties nationwide
​
  • Baker v. Carr (1962)
    • Legislative districts must have roughly equal populations--"one person, one vote."​
​Impact:
✔ Forced states to redraw legislative districts--Redistricting
✔ Increased political power of urban and ethnic minority areas
  • Engel v. Vitale (1962)
    • Banned state-sponsored prayer in public schools​
​Impact:
✔ Sparked political controversy
✔ Strengthened separation of church and state


  • Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)
    • Recognized a constitutional “right to privacy” in contraception and reproductive choice.​
​Impact:
✔ Laid groundwork for later reproductive rights cases






​



​
​


Picture
​​Key Cases:
  • Roe v. Wade (1973)
    • Recognized a constitutional right to privacy that included a woman’s right to choose abortion (within limits).​
​Impact:
✔ Sparked decades of political controversy
✔Expanded privacy rights
✔In 2022, the Supreme Court overturned its previous ruling in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson. This ruling also overruled Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which had previously upheld the core findings of Roe.


  • Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)
    • Allowed affirmative action but struck down rigid racial quotas.​
​Impact:
✔ Permitted race to be considered among other factors in college admissions but rejected strict quotas. 
✔ Limited strict quota systems


  • United States v. Nixon (1974)
    • President Nixon had to turn over the Watergate tapes.​
​Impact:
✔ Limited executive privilege
✔ Reinforced checks and balances




Picture
​​The Conservative Era 
The Rehnquist and Roberts Courts (1986–Today)
​
Characterized by a conservative shift that limited federal power, strengthened states’ rights, restricted some civil rights expansions, and promoted law-and-order principles—while maintaining certain major precedents like Roe v. Wade. The Rehnquist Court reflected the rise of modern conservatism during the Reagan–Bush era.

AP Periods 9
Picture
​Key Cases:

  • Bush v. Gore (2000)
    • Stopped the Florida recounting of election ballots, helping to decide the 2000 presidential election.​
​Impact:
✔ Demonstrated the Court’s enormous political influence
✔ Increased controversy around judicial involvement in elections


​


Return to the top of the page
Picture